Safaricom IPO Fast Money Analysis
Among the many irregularities that accompanied Safaricom's IPO was the ability by retail investors to buy the shares through margin. Unlike Kenya, retail investors in America cannot purchase initial public offerings using margin owing to the higher risks posed by such securities.
Considering that margin is usually used for short term trades, most of the retail investors who took bank loans to buy into SFCOM will have to repay their loans in the shortest time possible in order to maximize their gains. To do so, they will either have to sell their shares or seek funds from elsewhere. My guess is that most of the borrowers intend to flip their shares as soon as the price is right. And going by past NSE offerings, it is likely that they will dispose their shares during the first few weeks of trading as this is when the easy money is made.
Owing to the over-subscription of the IPO and the uncertainty surrounding the first few weeks of trading, this group of investors speculators may have bitten more than they can chew.
Using back-of-the-envelop calculations, the outlook does not look that rosy considering the risks they have taken to buy into SFCOM through margin. Here's why....
First I'll start with the following assumptions;
- Average allocation; 30% of shares applied.
- Initial margin requirement; 0% (i.e. 100% Loan-To-Value)
- Interest rate; 15% APR (AER = 19.56%)
- Costs; 2% of loan amount, 2,000/= pledge fees, 30/= CDSC levy, 300/= funds transfer fee, no prepayment penalty and interest charged.
- Period; 3 months from date of application to refund date and loan pay-off.
- Selling price; 10/= (fingers crossed as stock broker ineptitude is high in Kenya).
- Not factored; short term gains tax, selling commission, any other miscellaneous fees
| Loan, Kshs | Cost, Kshs | Shares | Break-even price, Kshs | Profit, Kshs | Yield, % |
10,000 | 2,886 | 600 | 9.81 | 114 | 1.14 |
25,000 | 3,719 | 1,500 | 7.48 | 3,781 | 15.12 |
50,000 | 5,108 | 3,000 | 6.70 | 9,892 | 19.78 |
100,000 | 7,886 | 6,000 | 6.31 | 22,114 | 22.11 |
150,000 | 10,664 | 9,000 | 6.18 | 34,336 | 22.81 |
200,000 | 13,442 | 12,000 | 6.12 | 46,558 | 23.28 |
250,000 | 16,220 | 15,000 | 6.08 | 58,780 | 23.51 |
300,000 | 18,997 | 18,000 | 6.06 | 71,003 | 23.67 |
350,000 | 21,775 | 21,000 | 6.04 | 83,225 | 23.78 |
400,000 | 24,553 | 24,000 | 6.02 | 95,447 | 23.86 |
450,000 | 27,331 | 27,000 | 6.01 | 107,669 | 23.93 |
500,000 | 30,109 | 30,000 | 6.00 | 119,891 | 23.98 |
1,000,000 | 57,888 | 60,000 | 5.96 | 242,112 | 24.21 |
2,000,000 | 113,446 | 120,000 | 5.95 | 486,554 | 24.33 |
5,000,000 | 280,120 | 300,000 | 5.93 | 1,219,880 | 24.40 |
10,000,000 | 557,911 | 600,000 | 5.93 | 2,442,089 | 24.42 |
The rich get richer and the poor get poorer - Markovnikov's rule
As you can see from the table, the less the amount borrowed the lower the profit margin. However, those who take on more risk and borrow into the millions, will reap the greater yields. And all this hinges on the fact that the stock brokers will execute their clients trades in a timely manner.
Assuming that Safaricom is priced below 10 shillings, those who borrowed heavily will still make a profit even if their sell orders are executed several weeks late. From a bank's perspective, the huge loans carry a lower risk unlike the small time investors who will be underwater if they don't sell immediately.
Going by the numerous of complaints that I hear from sellers and the large number of retail investors who will be hoping to hit it big, I have every reason to believe that the brokers will leave a lot of the small time investors high and dry.
For this reason, had I taken a loan to buy the shares I would start making payments even before the allocation is announced. While SFCOM makes a good stock for a quick post-IPO trade, I believe better prospects await long term investors. Unfortunately, it is not financially prudent to hold on to both the loan and the shares, as the interest charge will wipe out the gains once the shares stabilize after the post-IPO hyphoria.
While I don't want to sound gloomy and discourage risk takers, I believe the regulatory body, Capital Markets Authority, has abdicated its role in protecting investors. And the fact that two stockbrokers have gone belly-up without any action on their part means that they are not up to the task. Instead they are in bed with the stock brokers to continue fleecing unsuspecting members of the public.
Come the 9th of June at 10:30 am when Michael Joseph and/or Amos Kimunya ring the bell at the bourse, 10 shillings will be the magic number for many of the speculators. Anything less than this price will result in sleepless nights characterized by tossing and turning.
Should SFCOM fail to rise past 6 shillings, it will matter very little how much money speculators borrowed as they will all be counting their losses. In addition, the banks will have to absorb some of these losses.
Media reports indicating that Equity Bank lent 15 billion shillings to the masses means that they hold a greater risk than most high street banks that are known to shun small time borrowers. Like in the case of the U.S. sub-prime mess, they may find out that it is never prudent to give loans to hoi polloi for speculative purposes.
Come the first day of trading, we will find out whether SFCOM will live up to its billing as the mother of all IPO's.
Good luck to all the punters.
Addendum; According to the East African, some of the loans were for a fixed period of 6 months. To get the loan, all one had to do was pay the costs (which included pre-paid interest) and the shares would be held by the bank in one's CDSC account. This means the banks will only suffer a loss if the price fell below 5 shillings and the yields are 3.68% lower across the board.
Who was it that said that banks are there to help people make money?




